Resources For the Indie Film-maker
Archive for January, 2008
Tidbits
Jan 31st
A couple of articles on some film-maker’s opinions on HD and film.
Aussie film-makers talk high-def
Tropfest finalists weigh in on HD vs film
I personally can’t wait to see the back of film. Sure it’s image quality is unsurpassed and you get that “film-look” for free, but the costs of film and developing and telecine is not worth it in this day and age. With the technological breakthroughs done in digital slr photography, film has pretty much been wiped out in that field and I can predict that in a few years down the track, film everywhere will become a very small niche market.
Is Film School Necessary?
Jan 30th
I spent three years doing a Film and Television degree at a local university. The first year didn’t really have anything to do with film and television. This was because I started out doing a computer science course. I took electives in multimedia subjects because that was what I was interested in at the time. In one of those classes, we were able to take out a little mini-dv camcorder and make stupid little movies. Our project at the time was to make an instructional video and even though none of us had a clue about cars, we did it on how to service your own car.
The end result of that video was pretty average but I came away from that experience with some fond memories. Memories of a group of people working and bonding over the same goal. Right after that, I changed courses to do Film and Video. The only problem was I was halfway through the 2nd semester of my computer science course and had to wait until next year to become a film student. So in the mean time I absorbed myself in a self learning journey. I visited hundreds of websites and forums and got out ten dvds a week. I lived and breathed film before I had even started my film course.
When the new year began and I was officially a film student, I sat quite bored through the first lecture. The lecturer, even though she was bright and enthusiastic, didn’t say anything that was new and exciting to me. Perhaps it was because of the early morning start of the lecture or my laziness but I didn’t go to another lecture. That didn’t make it easy for me in the workshops as my lecturer was also my workshop tutor so she would always give me grief about not being at the lectures.
The semester went on and it finally came time to do our first short film. Because it was still our first year, we weren’t allowed to come up with our own idea but instead had to pick a script from a list of five that had been done by the previous semester’s scriptwriting class. The script that we had chosen just happened to be written by a middle aged woman who was in our group. Naturally she was the director, my friend the assistant director and I was the D.O.P or director of photography. I felt quite confident in the role, what with all those hours spent reading and asking questions and all the movies I had watched.
After shooting had finished and it came time to edit our master piece, a realisation came over all of us that we really didn’t know f*ck all about film-making. The direction was terrible, the acting was horrendous, the boom somehow managed to get in to most of the good takes and I learnt why “crossing the line” as a D.O.P wasn’t a good thing.
Did I decide to give up right then and there and take up computer science again? Hell no! Me and my mate sat in the editing suite for hours, cutting like madmen, learning all the important functions of Final Cut. If the acting was terrible, we’d just cut to the other actor’s reactions. If the boom was in the shot we’d add widescreen bars to hide it. If the 180° rule had been broken we’d flip the image around. We’d learnt that editing can make a terrible terrible film quite… adequate. And from there I was hooked!
When the 2nd semester came around, I confronted it head on with all the lessons learnt from the previous. This time we were allowed to come up with our own scripts and if our film was any good, it would be shown in a little film festival held at our uni’s tavern. That got me amped, my first film festival!
I joined a new fresh face group and immediately started to think of an idea before anyone came up with one. My pitch went something like… bad guy, who has been bad his whole life gets a magic book about karma that shows him the way to enlightenment. When bad guy figures it out and decides to become good he gets hit by a bus.
That pitch got me some laughs but then I was bombarded by questions. “What do you mean bad, like bush bad or hitler bad?”, “Why’s the book magic, does it talk?”, “How are we going to hit this guy with a bus?”. Being the person who wanted to take this film somewhere I explained that important phrases in the book would magically glow and I’d do the bus hit in post with After Effects. This despite the fact I’d never used After Effects before and thought it would be the answer to everything. Once I convinced the group to go with my idea, I quickly discovered that not only did I need to learn After Effects, I also needed to figure out how to plan and shoot the bus hit shot.
Why did I want to add such amounts of efforts into this short 4 minute film? I wanted to push this film above the others and give it a chance in the film festival. I wanted to show off and figured no one else would be doing these visual fx type shots. So long story short, I learnt just enough of After Effects to complete the shots I needed. The film came third in the university’s film festival but I entered it into a national short film festival and low and behold it got in. Not only that but it won third place in the audience choice awards. Something tells me 3 is a significant number for me.
Since then I’ve gone on to work on many other short films, docos, and video projects. Some have been accepted into film festivals and won awards, some haven’t but when I think back to what was the most important film of all, it was the first disaster that turned out quite adequate. It taught me some lessons that no matter how much you think you know something there’s always way too much more to learn. Even now after four years I feel I have just scraped the tip of the iceberg even though I am multiples better now.
So begs the question, is film school necessary? When I think back to it, I don’t think I really learned that much from my lecturers and tutors. I’m not saying I didn’t get anything out of them, in fact they inspired me to try harder but everything I know came from mistakes and knowledge that is widely available out there such as the Internet, books and watching behind the scenes dvds. I think the most important of those is in making and identifying mistakes you have made so you’ll know next time to lift that boom a little higher or to never cross that line. Sure film school helps in supplying camera equipment and motivation to complete a film but if you’ve got all that then there is no better way to get better at your craft then to just get out there and do it, learn from your mistakes and other people’s mistakes. Read or watch things you are interested in but don’t get bogged down by stuffing your brain with too much information. Most importantly though is the old cliché… go out there and have fun because if you are not having fun then this isn’t the hobby or career for you.
Why I love Premiere Pro… and hate it.
Jan 30th
I’ve been using Premiere Pro since version 1. Before that I used Premiere 6.5 and all the way back to version 4.5. In other words, I’ve been using it for a very long time. Here’s a list of reasons why I love this program.
- It is so easy to use, a trained monkey could edit something decent. Its unmodular type interface is similar to Final Cut’s. You could just as easily become familiar with the program by using alot of mouse, or you could also learn the short-cut keys. I personally use a combination of both.
- It integrates beautifully with After Effects. Even if you don’t have the production package and dynamic link, AE and Ppro are like brother and sister which is no surprise as they come from the same family. You can forget about Automatic Duck, if you want to load a Ppro project in AE, you just import it and magically it appears with all the clips sorted on their own layers, opacity, speed and similar plug-in settings also come through.
- Another thing about the relationship with AE is Ppro can use a lot of the same plug-ins. So if you are one of those people that loves to use Trapcode shine or those Re:Vision plug-ins, you no longer have to switch programs.
- This is a recent addition but Ppro now comes with its own trimming tool. I think adobe is starting to look at Avid for inspiration here and good on them, the trimming tool makes frame accurate cuts a piece of pi**.
- I’ve talked about the integration with AE, but the same could be said for Encore. Exporting a timeline complete with chapter markers from Ppro to Encore to burn straight to dvd or to create some menus has never been quicker.
- Another new feature, multiple bins has made my life so much easier. Its great to fill the second monitor with every bin you need and not have to tab through them to find the right clip. Another inspiration from Avid I see.
Ok now for some reasons why I don’t like Premiere Pro.
- For those hoping to export the timeline out to Protools or some other audio DAW, Ppro seriously lacks in this department. The AAF in Ppro is beyond a joke, I’ve never been able to import it into any DAW out there without it being totally screwed up. Premiere also lacks an OMF export which Final Cut and Avid both have. Sure they may have to pay some licensing fees to Avid but for those Indie’s out there who work with sound designers/composers or even those who prefer to do their audio in a seperate application that is not Soundbooth (don’t get me started on this pathetic excuse of an audio program), it would mean the world of difference to them.
- Ppro has been quite stable for me over the past few projects. I’ve rarely had a crash and working with SD footage is like butter… smoooth. Open up another program like AE and Ppro starts to lag badly. I don’t know if it is poor Windows memory management or poor programming on Adobe’s part. When Ppro has to share with other programs it chucks a major tantrum and refuses to play along.
- I once had to work on a nightmare rescue operation on a training dvd. What I thought would take a couple of hours took three days to complete because the previous guy thought he’d be a genius and move all the root video folders around. I thought Ppro had a feature where if you re-linked one file it would go through and find the rest of the files to re-link them. Sadly that is not the case if the directory structure has changed and I soon found myself cursing the previous editor and Adobe for not putting in a search and replace function.
Premiere not quite Pro
Jan 30th
I’m currently editing a music video in Premiere Pro and have noticed something quite annoying. It is extremely freaking slow working in HD. Of course it is my fault, I wanted to test out the cineform range of codecs that are on trial and thought, I might as well try out the best. So I downloaded the Prospect 2k version. 15 days is plenty of time to edit a music video right?
First thoughts… capturing footage is a painfully slow process. After you have captured a clip you have to wait for the clip to be transcoded which depending on the length of the clip, can take a couple of minutes per clip. According to the hardware requirements Cineform recommends a 2.66ghz core2 duo as a minimum. I’m using a slightly lower spec 2.4ghz core2 but being a geek I’ve stuck a massive cooler on it and am running it at 3.33ghz so speed shouldn’t be an issue here.
I’ve noticed that when I hit play on the timeline or source window, it always seems to start off a bit jerky. Like it is buffering before playback like with some web videos. This is very annoying as I actually have to leave a few seconds of blank space at the start of the timeline to let Cineform buffer the video for it to play back without dropping frames. On the Cineform site they recommend a raid-0 set-up for best performance but a single 7200rpm drive should be fine as a minimum. I myself recommend getting a raid set-up as I’m feeling my crappy single sata drive is the reason for the jerky starts. The audio also always takes a moment to kick in after the video starts playing which is doubly annoying. Again it might be a hard-drive speed issue.
So what are the plusses of the Cineform Prospect 2k codec? Firstly it uses a high quality wavelet codec that can transcode your hdv footage into a 4:4:4 colour-space. Important for those wanting to maintain the maximum quality from your footage, especially after a colour grade. This is the reason why I’d chosen it although I am quite regretting it now. I have to do quite a few speed changes to a lot of my clips and the Cineform codec takes ages, and I mean ages to render them. Secondly its a more edit friendly format to hdv. I don’t think I’ve actually edited native hdv in Premiere Pro before so I can’t really vouch for that.
If I had a bombed-up computer with at least 4 cores and a huge raid set-up, I think I might actually enjoy editing with Prospect 2k but currently, I’m contemplating whether I should recapture the whole thing into Avid and start again.
Cinematic Tennis
Jan 30th
One thing I love about this time of the year is the tennis, more specifically the Australian Open. This year has been no different to previous years, a great distraction from the unbearable summer heat.
One thing I’ve noticed lately is how cinematic the camera work is. There’s the close-up of the server as he eyes his opponent before cutting to a medium wide shot of the thunderous serve. Then comes the normal wide angle view of the point until someone hits a winner or an error. What’s most cinematic though is the replay of the point, especially the brilliant slow motion footage of muscles jiggling and sweat spraying off of the players, it becomes almost mesmerising.
The programmers know this and one their biggest requests from viewers is a montage of the ultra slow-motion replay shots which is often backed by opera and orchestral scores.
Mental note… ultra slow motion of pretty much anything backed by an orchestral score equals cinematic magic for your viewers. All you’ll need is an ultra expensive Phantom camera set-up.

“Even Scorsese had to start somewhere…imagine how good he’d be if he’d started here.”
Jan 29th
I have created a site that I wish was around when I first started out as an aspiring film-maker. I don’t know about you but for me it was instantaneous. One minute I was struggling to find a reason why I’d chosen a computer science degree. The next I was picking up a video camera and making films. Maybe it was the geek in me who was fascinated by the technological gizmos required in todays indie film-making. Or the ego in me who thought about the fame, followed by the money and then the…. well you get the drift.
Of course the latter is highly unlikely to happen to most indies. Is it unlikely for me? That’s for me to decide but I know that once you drop that expectation, it becomes a lot easier for ideas to flow, and for things to get done. There is no doubt about it; you’ve chosen a path that is too steep for the procrastinator and too long for the ego tripper but perfect for the dedicated story teller.
Here you will find links to other resources around the net which I have gathered throughout the years. “Resources?” you say. Well unless you’re the incarnate of Kubrick or Hitchcock, every film-maker has to learn their craft at some stage. Not only learn it but master it to rise above the rest. I myself am no where near that level but hopefully we can reach for it while giving each other a boost along the way.
Keep in mind that there’s not much here yet, but it has only just begun…